
- (866) 254-5368
- info@tledgers.ca
- Mon-Fri 9am - 8pm
- Home
- About Us
- ServicesPayroll Services
Outsource your Payroll to us and we will ensure everyone is paid on time.
- Packages
- Blog
- Reviews
- Our Approach
- Contact Us
Outsource your Payroll to us and we will ensure everyone is paid on time.
Outsource your Payroll to us and we will ensure everyone is paid on time.
If you pay dividends, interest, or partnership income to a family member connected to your private corporation, the Tax on Split Income (TOSI) rules under section 120.4 of the Income Tax Act may tax that payment at the highest federal marginal rate, regardless of the recipient’s actual income. The single most important action you can take right now is to pause any new discretionary dividend payments to family members until you have confirmed which exclusions apply and gathered contemporaneous records proving their involvement.
Before your next family dividend payment, do these two things:
TOSI taxes certain family-connected income at the top marginal rate under section 120.4 of the Income Tax Act, and the only reliable defence is an exclusion supported by contemporaneous documentation.
| Point | Details |
|---|---|
| TOSI triggers | Dividends, certain capital gains, and related-party income from private corporations paid to connected family members. |
| Age determines exclusions | Recipients under 18 have almost no relief; those 25 and over can access excluded business, excluded shares, and reasonable return tests. |
| Excluded shares threshold | The recipient must own at least 10% of votes and value, and the corporation must pass the 90% gross income test. |
| Documentation is the defence | Contemporaneous records of hours, capital, and resolutions created before payment are the most critical factor in a CRA audit. |
| T-Ledgers can help | T-Ledgers offers flat-rate virtual CFO and tax filing services to review TOSI exposure and support compliant family-income planning. |
TOSI is the federal tax mechanism that prevents high-income business owners from reducing their family’s overall tax bill by shifting income to lower-bracket relatives. The rules have applied in their current, expanded form since the 2018 tax year, following the Department of Finance’s 2017 consultation paper, Tax Planning Using Private Corporations, which proposed closing what the government viewed as aggressive income-splitting arrangements.
The statutory authority is section 120.4 of the Income Tax Act. When TOSI applies, the income is taxed at the top federal marginal rate in the recipient’s hands, and most personal tax credits (other than the basic personal amount and the dividend tax credit, which is itself limited) cannot offset it.
Income types that can trigger TOSI:
What TOSI does not capture:
A practitioner handbook on TOSI notes that the rules also reach income from certain debt obligations of private corporations, trusts, and partnerships, so owners should review shareholder loans, related-party interest, and trust allocations when assessing their exposure.
Key legal reference: CRA administers TOSI under s.120.4 of the Income Tax Act. Amounts subject to TOSI are reported on Form T1206 and flow to Line 40424 of the T1 personal return. CRA’s guidance document, Guidance on the application of the split income rules for adults, is the primary administrative reference for exclusions and examples.
TOSI applies to a “specified individual,” which is any Canadian resident who receives income from a “related business.” A related business is generally one in which a family member (spouse, parent, sibling, or child) is actively engaged or holds a significant interest. For a Saskatchewan family running a private corporation, this typically means any family member receiving dividends from the company is a specified individual unless an exclusion applies.
Practical scenarios:
Age determines which exclusions are available, and the rules become progressively more flexible as recipients get older.
| Age group | TOSI applies? | Key tests available |
|---|---|---|
| Under 18 | Yes (original “kiddie tax”) | Very limited; excluded business test rarely met |
| 18–24 | Yes, with limited relief | Safe-harbour capital return; arm’s-length capital limit |
| 25 and over | Yes, but more exclusions available | Excluded business; excluded shares; reasonable return |
An RSM Canada technical paper emphasises that distinguishing whether income is derived from a “related business” requires a facts-and-circumstances analysis, particularly when the corporation earns a mix of active business income and passive investment income.
Satisfying even one of the following exclusions removes the income from TOSI entirely. Each test has specific criteria, and CRA applies them strictly.
A family member’s income is excluded if they are “actively engaged on a regular, continuous, and substantial basis” in the business. CRA treats working at least 20 hours per week during the part of the year the business operates as a safe harbour. There is also a five-year lookback: if the individual was actively engaged in any five prior years (not necessarily consecutive), the exclusion can apply in later years even if their hours have since dropped.

For a Saskatchewan farm family or a small professional practice, this test is often the most practical route. The catch is documentation: you need timesheets, schedules, or other contemporaneous records showing the hours worked.
Under CRA’s excluded shares guidance, shares qualify as excluded shares when all of the following conditions are met:
This last point is the one most commonly missed. If your corporation primarily invoices another family-owned company, the excluded shares test may fail even if the ownership thresholds are met.
For individuals 25 and over, a dividend is excluded to the extent it is “reasonable” given the individual’s labour contribution, property contributed, risks assumed, historical payments, and any other relevant factors. CRA does not publish a formula; it weighs all the circumstances. A spouse who invested $200,000 in the business and has taken on personal guarantees on corporate debt has a stronger reasonable-return argument than one who contributed no capital and performs no work.
For individuals aged 18–24, a limited exclusion applies to returns on capital they personally contributed at arm’s length. The excluded amount is calculated using the prescribed interest rate, applied to the individual’s contributed capital. This is a narrow relief and rarely covers the full dividend in practice.
Decision checklist before paying a family dividend:
TOSI is not a separate tax return; it is an additional federal tax calculated within the T1 personal return of the recipient. Here is how the reporting works in practice.
Step-by-step reporting:
The expanded TOSI rules apply to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018. CRA’s income sprinkling FAQ confirms that CRA expected taxpayers to file on the basis of the proposed legislation from 2018 onward, and Form T1206 was updated to reflect the expanded rules.
The goal is not to avoid paying family members; it is to structure those payments so they survive CRA scrutiny. There are several approaches that work, and a few that consistently fail.
What works:
What consistently fails:
When restructuring share classes or setting up formal buy-ins, involve a tax lawyer alongside your CPA. The tax implications of a share reorganisation can be significant, and the structure needs to hold up to scrutiny from the date it is implemented.
CRA’s review of TOSI positions focuses heavily on whether the taxpayer can prove, with records created at the time, that an exclusion was genuinely met. Practitioner analysis from Mondaq identifies the lack of contemporaneous documentation as the single most common and critical deficiency found in TOSI audits. Retrospective evidence rarely convinces CRA.
Common CRA red flags:
Documentation checklist:
Retain all records for at least six years from the end of the tax year to which they relate. Electronic records are acceptable provided they are legible and complete.
Pro Tip: Document the rationale for every family dividend payment in a dated board resolution or memo before the payment is made. Include the specific exclusion you are relying on, the evidence supporting it, and the amount. A one-page memo written the day before the dividend is declared is worth more in a CRA audit than a binder assembled two years later.
A short action checklist you can run today:
TOSI does not exist in isolation. When it applies, it interacts with several other parts of the tax return in ways that can compound the cost.
The dividend tax credit, which normally reduces the tax on eligible or non-eligible dividends, is available only to the extent of the recipient’s regular tax otherwise payable. It cannot reduce the TOSI amount itself. This means a family member with little other income, who might otherwise pay minimal tax on a dividend, can end up with a significant tax bill purely because of TOSI.
The basic personal amount credit can offset a portion of TOSI, but most other personal credits (tuition, medical, charitable donations) cannot. This limits the usual tax-planning tools available to lower-income family members.
TOSI also affects the family’s overall marginal rate planning. One of the core reasons families distribute income to lower-bracket members is to access lower marginal rates. TOSI eliminates that benefit for split income, effectively taxing it at the highest federal rate regardless of the recipient’s other income. For Saskatchewan residents, the combined federal and provincial top marginal rate applies to TOSI amounts, making non-compliant distributions significantly more expensive than anticipated.
Finally, TOSI income cannot be sheltered by RRSP contribution room. The recipient cannot deduct an RRSP contribution against TOSI tax, since TOSI is a separate additional tax, not part of the regular income calculation.
Failing to report split income correctly carries the same penalty and interest regime as other federal tax non-compliance, with a few points worth noting specifically.
If TOSI is assessed on audit, CRA will reassess the recipient’s T1 return to add the tax at the top marginal rate. Interest accrues on the unpaid amount from the original filing due date (generally April 30 of the following year) at the prescribed rate, compounded daily. For amounts that have been outstanding for several years before an audit, the interest alone can be substantial.
The gross negligence penalty under section 163(2) of the Income Tax Act can apply if CRA determines the taxpayer knowingly or under circumstances amounting to gross negligence failed to report the split income. It is not automatic, but CRA is more likely to apply it where the taxpayer had access to professional advice and the income-splitting arrangement was clearly structured to avoid TOSI.
The late-filing penalty under section 162(1) applies if the T1 return is filed late and TOSI is owing.
Voluntary disclosure through CRA’s Voluntary Disclosures Programme can reduce or eliminate penalties (though not interest) for taxpayers who come forward before CRA contacts them. If you believe prior years’ returns may have incorrectly excluded split income, speaking with a tax professional about a voluntary disclosure is worth considering before CRA initiates a review.
TOSI is a federal tax, but it has direct provincial consequences. Saskatchewan levies its own provincial income tax on the same income base, and the provincial tax on split income is calculated separately from the federal TOSI amount.
For Saskatchewan residents, the provincial split income tax is reported using Form T2203 when the individual has income from multiple jurisdictions, or directly on the Saskatchewan provincial schedule of the T1 return for single-province filers. The provincial tax rate applied to split income is Saskatchewan’s top marginal provincial rate, which applies to the same income that attracted federal TOSI.
Saskatchewan does not have its own separate “TOSI” legislation; the province piggybacks on the federal definition of split income and the federal exclusions. This means that if an exclusion applies federally (excluded business, excluded shares, or reasonable return), it also applies provincially. Conversely, if federal TOSI applies, provincial tax on that amount follows automatically.
One practical implication for Saskatchewan farm families and agribusiness owners: if your corporation earns income from both farming operations and passive investments, the classification of income as active business income versus property income affects both the federal TOSI analysis and the Saskatchewan provincial tax calculation. The RSM Canada practical approach paper highlights that this distinction requires a careful facts-and-circumstances review, not a formulaic answer.
Estate planning for family businesses in Saskatchewan needs to account for TOSI at two distinct points: during the owner’s lifetime when shares are transferred or gifted, and at death when the estate is administered.
During lifetime transfers:
Transferring shares to adult children or a family trust can trigger TOSI if the transferred shares do not meet the excluded shares criteria or if the recipient is not actively engaged in the business. Shares transferred to a family trust are particularly complex: trust distributions to adult beneficiaries are subject to TOSI unless the beneficiary independently meets an exclusion test.
At death:
When a business owner dies, the deemed disposition rules under section 70 of the Income Tax Act treat the owner as having sold all assets at fair market value immediately before death. Capital gains arising from this deemed disposition are not split income and are not subject to TOSI. However, if shares are distributed from the estate to beneficiaries who then receive dividends from the corporation, those dividends can be subject to TOSI in the beneficiaries’ hands if no exclusion applies.
The spousal rollover under section 70(6) allows shares to pass to a surviving spouse at cost, deferring the capital gain. This is a standard estate-planning tool, but it does not resolve the TOSI exposure that arises when the surviving spouse later receives dividends from the corporation. The spouse still needs to meet an exclusion test (excluded shares or reasonable return) for those future dividends to avoid TOSI.
Executors and estate trustees should review the TOSI status of any corporate shares in the estate and flag potential exposure to beneficiaries before distributions are made. Documenting the basis for any exclusion claimed in the estate’s terminal return or in the beneficiary’s T1 is as important in an estate context as it is during the owner’s lifetime.

The TOSI rules are genuinely complex, but the single variable that determines whether a family business survives a CRA review is almost always documentation, not the structure itself. Many families have legitimate exclusions available to them and lose them entirely because no one wrote anything down at the time.
At T-Ledgers, we see this pattern repeatedly: a well-structured arrangement that should qualify under the excluded business or reasonable return test falls apart because the records were assembled after the fact. CRA reviewers are experienced at spotting retrospective documentation, and they discount it heavily. The families who fare best are those who treat each dividend payment as a decision that needs a paper trail, not a routine transaction.
T-Ledgers’ virtual CFO and business tax filing services are built around exactly this kind of proactive planning. Our CPAs help you identify your TOSI exposure before payments are made, build the documentation framework that supports your exclusion, and handle the reporting correctly so there are no surprises at filing time.
TOSI exposure is one of the most common and costly surprises for Saskatchewan family businesses, and it is almost entirely preventable with the right planning in place before dividends are declared.

T-Ledgers offers flat-rate virtual CFO services that include a TOSI risk review as part of your annual tax planning. There are no hourly billing surprises: you know the cost upfront, and the work covers identifying which family members are specified individuals, confirming which exclusions apply, building the documentation checklist specific to your situation, and completing Form T1206 and Line 40424 correctly at filing time. When you reach out, bring your shareholder register, the most recent corporate financial statements, any existing shareholder agreements, and a brief note on each family member’s role and capital contributions. That is enough to get a clear picture of your exposure and a plan to address it.
TOSI (Tax on Split Income) taxes certain income paid to family members connected to a private corporation at the top federal marginal rate, under section 120.4 of the Income Tax Act. The rules apply to dividends, certain capital gains, and related-party income, and have been in their current expanded form since the 2018 tax year.
TOSI applies if you are a Canadian resident who received income from a “related business” in which a family member is actively engaged or holds a significant interest, and you do not qualify for an exclusion such as excluded business, excluded shares, or reasonable return. Your age and the nature of your involvement in the business determine which exclusions are available to you.
Each exclusion requires contemporaneous documentation to withstand CRA review.
TOSI does not use a “low income” threshold; it applies based on the relationship between the recipient and the business, not the recipient’s income level. The tax is calculated at the top marginal rate regardless of the recipient’s other income, so even a family member with no other income pays TOSI at the highest rate on split income amounts that do not qualify for an exclusion.
TOSI applies to dividends, capital gains, and certain other income from private corporations paid to connected family members. Section 67 applies to salary and wages paid to family members, requiring that the amount be reasonable for the services actually performed. Salary is not split income and is not subject to TOSI, but CRA will still review whether the salary amount is reasonable compared to what an arm’s-length employee would earn for the same work.
This article provides general information about Canadian tax rules and is not a substitute for professional tax advice. Confirm current rules with the Canada Revenue Agency or a qualified tax professional before making decisions about family income distributions.










